Why do socially responsible firms pay more dividends?
نویسنده
چکیده
Using a sample of 22,389 US firm-year observations over the period from 1991 to 2012, we find that high CSR firms pay more dividends than low CSR firms. This is consistent with our expectation that socially responsible firms may use the dividend policy to manage the agency problems related to overinvestment in CSR. The analysis of individual components of CSR provides strong support for this main finding: five of the six dimensions used in the analysis are also associated with high dividend payout, namely, corporate governance, community, diversity, employee relations, environment. Furthermore, by analyzing the stability of dividend payout, we find that socially irresponsible firms adjust dividends quicker than do socially responsible firms: dividend payout is more stable in high CSR firms than in low CSR firms. Additional results show that firms involved in two controversial activities: military and alcohol are associated with low dividend payout which is likely due to the high cost of external funding for these firms as highlighted by Goss and Roberts (2011). Our findings are robust to alternative assumptions and model specifications, alternative measures of dividend payout, additional control variables, and several approaches to address endogeneity and selection bias issues.
منابع مشابه
Institutional Holdings and Payout Policy
We examine the relation between institutional holdings and payout policy in U.S. public firms between 1980 and 1996. We find that payout policy affects institutional holdings. Institutions avoid firms that do not pay any dividends. But among dividend paying firms, they prefer firms that pay fewer dividends. Our evidence indicates that institutions prefer firms that repurchase shares, and regula...
متن کاملDividends and Taxes
How do dividend taxes affect firm behavior and what are their distributional and efficiency effects? To answer these questions, the first problem is coming up with an explanation for why firms pay dividends, in spite of their tax penalty. This paper surveys three different models for why firms pay dividends, and then uses each model to examine the behavioral and efficiency effects of dividend t...
متن کاملDividends, Share Repurchases, and the Substitution Hypothesis
We show that repurchases have not only became an important form of payout for U.S. corporations, but also that firms finance their share repurchases with funds that otherwise would have been used to increase dividends. We find that young firms have a higher propensity to pay cash through repurchases than they did in the past and that repurchases have become the preferred form of initiating a ca...
متن کاملThe Pricing of Initial Public Offerings: Tests of Adverse-Selection and Signaling Theories
We test the empirical implications of several models of IPO underpricng. Consistent with the winner’s-curse hypothesis, we show that in markets where investors know a priori that they do not have to compete with informed investors, IPOs are not underpriced. We also show that IPOs underwritten by reputable investment banks experience significantly less underpricing and perform significantly bett...
متن کاملDo not wake sleeping dogs: Pay-out policies in founding family firms
This article examines founding family influence on pay-out policies for Swiss listed firms over the period 2003-2010. We find that founding family firms have higher dividends and total pay-outs than non-family firms. There is no significant difference between stock repurchases for the two types of firms. We show that specific firm characteristics such as active involvement of family members, th...
متن کامل